Drain or no drain in Rhomboid excision and Limberg rotational flap for pilonidal sinus
PDF

Keywords

Pilonidal Sinus
Rhomboid Flap
Wound infection

How to Cite

Joshi, A., & Acharya, B. (2021). Drain or no drain in Rhomboid excision and Limberg rotational flap for pilonidal sinus. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, 10(2), 80–83. Retrieved from https://jkmc.com.np/ojs3/index.php/journal/article/view/1036

Abstract

Background: Healing in Rhomboid flap for pilonidal sinus is always a problem. Different measures are applied to reduce the rate of wound infection with variable results.

Objectives: To determine the effect of routine use of drain on the rate of early wound complications and additional interventions after Rhomboid flap.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all cases that underwent Rhomboid flap in five years at two tertiary care centres was done. Complication rates such as wound infection, wound disruption, and flap necrosis were evaluated.

Results: A total of 38 cases of Rhomboid flap are included for analysis. Out of all cases, 37 cases were done for Pilonidal sinus and one case for presacral dermoid cyst. In the first eight cases, flap was made without drain and subsequent 30 cases were done with two suction drains for five days. The rate of superficial wound infection in the group without drain was found to be significantly higher compared with flap with drain five (in eight) versus two (in 30) (62.5% versus 6.66%, p <0.5).

Conclusion: Drain placement after Rhomboid flap is a good intervention to reduce wound infection.

PDF

References

Gibson T. Modern trends in plastic surgery. London: Butterworth and Co; 1964. 319 p. [Full Text]

Aithal SK, Rajan CS, Reddy N. Limberg flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus a safe and sound procedure. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(4):298-301. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Ersoy OF, Karaca S, Kayaoglu HA, Ozkan N, Celik A, Ozum T. Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: Retrospective analysis of 175 patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007;23:67-70. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Jamal A, Shamim M, Hashmi F, Qureshi MI. Open excision with secondary healing versus rhomboid excision with Limberg transposition flap in the management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(3):157-60. [PubMed | Full Text]

Irpatgire RN, Chakrod SV. Limberg flap reconstruction following rhomboid excision of the sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Int Surg J. 2016;3(2):846-9. [Full Text | DOI]

Akin M, Gokbayir H, Kilic K, Topgul K, Ozdemir E, FerahKose Z. Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus. Long-term results in 411 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(9):945-8. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Kirkil C, Böyük A, Bülbüller N, Aygen E, Karabulut K, Co?kun S. The effects of drainage on the rates of early wound complications and recurrences after Limberg flap reconstruction in patients with pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):425- 9. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Erdem E, Sungurtekin U, Nessar M. Are postoperative drains necessary with the Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus? Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(11):1427-31. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]