Scoring system in predicting perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity in a tertiary level hospital of eastern Nepal

Supplementary Files

PDF

Keywords

American society of anaesthesiologist; Boey; peptic ulcer perforation score; perforated duodenal ulcer; risk score.

How to Cite

Sah, N. P., & Sah, K. (2024). Scoring system in predicting perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity in a tertiary level hospital of eastern Nepal: A retrospective study. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, 13(1), 44–50. Retrieved from https://jkmc.com.np/ojs3/index.php/journal/article/view/1323

Abstract

Introduction: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) disease is a common indication of emergency surgery, accounting for 2–10% of all peptic ulcer cases. The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA), Boey, and the peptic ulcer perforation (

References

Lohsiriwat V, Prapasrivorakul S, Lohsiriwat D. Perforated peptic ulcer: Clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the boey scoring system in predicting post-operative morbidity and mortality. World J Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):80-5. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Darwin Britto D, Ramesh Kashyap A, et al. Frailty of Boey Score in PPU mortality and morbidity prediction - A prospective study. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2017;6(77):5482-5. [Full Text | DOI]

Sah DN. Boey score in predicting outcome in perforated peptic ulcer from tertiary referral centre of Nepal. ARC Journal of Surgery. 2019;5(1):9-14. [Full Text]

Menekse E, Kocer B, Topcu R, et al. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10(1):1-6. [PubMed | Full Text| DOI]

Møller MH, Engebjerg MC, Adamsen S, et al. The peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score. Acta Anaesthesiolog Scand. 2012;56(5):655-62. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Sah D, Upadhyaya PK. Scoring system in outcome prediction of post-operative mortality and morbidity in perforated peptic ulcer. Global Surgery. 2018;4(4):1-4. [Full Text]

Saafan T, El Ansari W, Al-Yahri O, et al. Assessment of PULP score in predicting 30-day perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity, and comparison of its performance with Boey and ASA, a retrospective study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019;42(April):23-8. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Boey J, SK C, A P, et al. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987;205:22–6. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Ta? I, Ülger BV, Önder A, et al. Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Turkish Journal of Surgery. 2015;31(1):20-5. [Full Text | DOI]

Lee FYJ, Ka Lau Leung, Lai BSP, et al. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Archives of Surgery. 2001;136(1):90–4. [PubMed| Full Text| DOI]

Nomani AZ, Qureshi MS, Malik AK. A new prognostic scoring system for perforation peritonitis secondary to duodenal ulcers. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2014;64(1). [PubMed |Full Text| DOI]

Unver M, Firat Ö, Ünalp ÖV, et al. Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: A retrospective 14-year study. International Surgery. 2015;100(5):942–8. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Ohtonen P, et al. Factors that predict morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. Eur J Surg. 2002;168(8-9):446-51. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Kim JM, Jeong SH, Lee YJ, et al. Analysis of risk factors for post-operative morbidity in perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12(1):26-35. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Buck DL, Vester-Andersen M, Møller MH. Accuracy of clinical prediction rules in peptic ulcer perforation: An observational study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(1):28-35. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]

Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, et al. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(8):1329-35. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]