Abstract
Introduction: Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures are common injuries encountered in orthopaedic practice. Traditionally, these fractures needing operative treatment have been managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with various wire positions/configurations. Operative treatment, plate and screw fixation provides superior biomechanical strength compared to k wire.
Objectives: To evaluate the functional outcome of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures treated with open reduction and fixation with screws with or without plates.
Methodology: The study was conducted in KMC Teaching Hospital, Sinamangal, Department of Orthopaedics. The study included 36 metacarpal and 11 phalangeal fracture cases in 38 patients. All included patients were operated with open reduction and internal fixation with 1.5 mm mini plate systems. Both metacarpal and phalangeal fracture were treated with dorsal approach. Patients were discharged on second post operative day after wound inspection. Functional outcome was evaluated with DASH scoring system at six weeks, three months, and six months post operatively.
Results: Out of 38 patients two were lost to follow-up. Among 36 patients at six weeks post-surgery, average DASH score was 63.18±15.3. This score improved to an average of 32.62±16.15 and 4.23±5.97 at three months and six months respectively. Among 44 bones fixed, 31 bones showed radiological union at the end of three months. One case did not show union at six months.
Conclusion: Mini plate and screw constructs provide superior biomechanical strength. Hence, rigid stable fixation provided by plating allowed early mobilization and achieved good functional results. Proper preoperative planning and sharp dissection with meticulous handling of soft tissue minimize complications.
References
Hove LM. Fractures of the hand. Distribution and relative incidence. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1993;27:317-9. [PubMed | Full Text| DOI]
Feehan LM, Sheps SB. Incidence and demographics of hand fractures in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. J Hand surg Am. 2006;31:1068-74. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Bosscha K, Snellen JP. Internal fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with AO minifragment screws and plates: a prospective study. Injury. 1993;24:166-8.[PubMed|Full Text|DOI]
Dreyfuss D, Allon R, Izacson N, Hutt D. A Comparison of Locking Plates and Intramedullary Pinning for Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures. Hand (New York, NY). 2019;14:27-33.[PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Brennwald J. Bone healing in the hand. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;7-10. [PubMed | Full Text]
Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Doherty W, Naraghi FF. Internal fixation of oblique metacarpal fractures. A biomechanical evaluation by impact loading. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;296-301. [PubMed | Full Text]
Firoozbakhsh KK, Moneim MS, Howey T, Castaneda E, Pirela-Cruz MA. Comparative fatigue strengths and stabilities of metacarpal internal fixation techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18:1059-68. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Mann RJ, Black D, Constine R, Daniels AU. A quantitative comparison of metacarpal fracture stability with five different methods of internal fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10:1024-8. [PubMed | Full Text| DOI]
Barr C, Behn AW, Yao J. Plating of metacarpal fractures with locked or nonlocked screws, a biomechanical study: how many cortices are really necessary? Hand (New York, NY). 2013;8:454-9. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Meunier MJ, Hentzen E, Ryan M, Shin AY, Lieber RL. Predicted effects of metacarpal shortening on interosseous muscle function. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29:689-93. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Ozer K, Gillani S, Williams A, Peterson SL, Morgan S. Comparison of Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate-Screw Fixation of Extra-Articular Metacarpal Fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1724-31. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Gupta R, Singh R, Siwach RC, Sangwan SS, Magu NK, Diwan R. Evaluation of surgical stabilization of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of hand. Indian J Ortho. 2007;41:224-9. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
