Comparison of root resorption between extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment
pdf

Keywords

Extraction
Non-extraction
Orthodontics
Panoramic radiograph
Root resorption

How to Cite

PYAKUREL, U., Gautam, U., Gupta, A., Acharya, A., & Dhakal, J. (2025). Comparison of root resorption between extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, 13(3), 172–7. Retrieved from https://jkmc.com.np/ojs3/index.php/journal/article/view/1396

Abstract

Introduction: Apical root resorption is a common consequence of orthodontic treatment, usually asymptomatic, arising from various biological and mechanical factors. Its severity may differ between extraction and non-extraction therapies.
Objectives: To evaluate and compare apical root resorption in patients with Angles Class I bimaxillary malocclusion treated with extraction versus Class I malocclusion treated with non-extraction orthodontic approaches using panoramic radiographs.
Methodology: This cross-sectional observational study included 120 patients (60 extraction, 60 non-extraction) treated in the Department of Orthodontics, Kantipur Dental College, Kathmandu. Apical root length (ARL) was calculated as the difference in root length between the pretreatment and post-treatment Orthopantomograms. All permanent teeth (11 to 47) were measured with Image J software, with intra-examiner reliability assessed via the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Statistical analysis was performed with independent t-tests for group comparisons.
Results: The ICC values ranged from 0.85 to 0.99, indicating excellent intra-examiner reliability. Root resorption was significantly greater in the extraction group (p < 0.05) for 20 of 24 teeth with 12, 35, and 45 showing the highest mean differences. In the non-extraction group, significant resorption was observed in 15 teeth, although with lower overall values. Four teeth (25, 27, 37, and 47) showed no significant difference between groups.
Conclusion: Apical root resorption was more pronounced with extraction-based orthodontic treatment, although resorption was also evident in non-extraction cases, underscoring its multifactorial nature.

pdf

References

Janson GRP, de Luca Canto G, Martins DR, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with 3 different fixed appliance techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000 Sep;118(3):262-273. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Rudolph DJ, Willes PMG, Sameshima GT. A finite element model of apical force distribution from orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthodontist. 2001 Feb;71(2):127-131. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Levander E, Malmgren O, Stenback K. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment of patients with multiple aplasia: a study of maxillary incisors. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1998 Aug;20(4):427- 434. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Linge BO, Linge L. Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1983 May;5(3):173-183. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Beck BW, Harris EF. Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated subjects: analysis of edgewise and light wire mechanics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1994 Apr;105(4):350-361. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Pastro JD, Nogueira AC, de Freitas KM, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH, de Oliveira RC. Factors associated with apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2018 Apr 30;12:331-339. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Hana G, Huang S, Von den Hoff JW, Zeng X, KuijpersJagtman AM. Root resorption after orthodontic intrusion and extrusion: an intraindividual study. Angle Orthodontist. 2005 Dec;75(6):918-924. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

de Freitas MR, Beltrão RT, Janson G, Henriques JF, Chiqueto K. Evaluation of root resorption after open bite treatment with and without extractions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007 Aug;132(2):143.e15-22. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Jiang RP, McDonald JP, Fu MK. Root resorption before and after orthodontic treatment: a clinical study of contributory factors. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010 Dec;32(6):693-697. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Kulshrestha R. Comparison of amount of root resorption seen in incisors radiographically during active orthodontic treatment using RVG and IOPA— an in vivo study. EC Dental Sciences. 2016;6:1251- 1258. [Full Text ]

Zahedani SZ, Oshagh M, Danaei SM, Roeinpeikar SM. A comparison of apical root resorption in incisors after fixed orthodontic treatment with standard edgewise and straight wire (MBT) method. Journal of Dentistry (Shiraz). 2013 Sep;14(3):103-109. [Pub Med | Full Text]

Ho KH, Liao YF. Pre-treatment radiographic features predict root resorption of treated impacted maxillary central incisors. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2012 Aug;15(3):198-205. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI ]

Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL. Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated adults. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1996 Sep;110(3):311-320. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

McFadden WM, Engstrom C, Engstrom H, Anholm JM. A study of the relationship between incisor intrusion and root shortening. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989 Nov;96(5):390-396. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part I. Diagnostic factors. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001 May;119(5):505-10. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]

Samandara A, Papageorgiou SN, IoannidouMarathiotou I, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA. Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2019 Jan;41(1):67-79. [Pub Med | Full Text | DOI]