Background: Learning preference is a complex character in which learners most efficiently perceive, process, store, and recall what they are learning.
Objectives: This study was conducted with an objective to identify the preferred learning styles of undergraduate dental students such that suitable modification in the teaching learning environment could be made.
Methodology: An analytical cross-sectional study was carried at B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal among undergraduate dental students from June to December 2019 after getting ethical approval. Convenience sampling method was used to include all undergraduate students from first to final year; of which 252 provided consent. VARK questionnaire (version 7.8) comprising 16 multiple choice questions were used to analyse the learning preferences and were accordingly categorised for further statistical analysis.
Results: Out of 280 students, a total of 252 (90%) students (90 males, 162 females) responded to the questionnaire among whom 89 (35.3%) had uni-modal learning preferences. Of the total, 55 (21.8%) had bi-modal, 39 (15.4%) had tri-modal, and 69 (27.3%) had quadri-modal learning preferences. Among the uni-modal preferences, ‘K mild’ was most common (36, 14.3%) followed by ‘A mild’. Among bi-modal learning preferences ‘AK type’ (35, 13.9%) was most common and VAK type was common among tri-modal learning preferences. ‘VARK type two’ (33, 13.1%) was common quadrimodal learning preferences.
Conclusion: This study highlighted the variations in learning preferences among dental students suggesting the need for a flexible learning environment. Understanding learning preferences can help to plan lessons effectively and help to manage students in a better way.
Aldosari MA, Aljabaa AH, Al-Sehaibany FS, Albarakati SF. Learning style preferences of dental students at a single institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, evaluated using the VARK questionnaire. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:179-86. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Fleming N. VARK. A guide to learning preferences. [Online]. 2020. [cited 2020 Oct 18]. [Full Text]
Keefe JW. Assessment of learning style variables: The NASSP task force model. Theory Into Practice. 1985;24:138-44. [DOI | Full Text]
Marcy V. Adult learning styles: How the VARK© learning style inventory can be used to improve student learning. J Physician Assist Educ. 2001;12:117-20. [Full Text]
Fleming ND, Mills C. Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improv Acad. 1992;11:137- 44. [Full Text | DOI]
Mozaffari HR, Janatolmakan M, Sharifi R, Ghandinejad F, Andayeshgar B, Khatony A. The relationship between the VARK learning styles and academic achievement in dental students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:15-9. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Saad Al-Saud LM. Learning style preferences of first-year dental students at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Influence of gender and GPA. J Dent Educ. 2013;77:1371-8. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Asiry MA. Learning styles of dental students. Saudi J Dent Res. 2016;7:13-7. [Full Text | DOI]
Shenoy N, Ashok Shenoy K, Ratnakar UP. The perceptual preferences in learning among dental students in clinical subjects. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2013;7:1683-5. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Liew SC, Sidhu J, Barua A. The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among preclinical undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:44. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Khanal L, Giri J, Shah S, Koirala S, Rimal J. Influence of learning-style preferences in academic performance in the subject of human anatomy: An institutionbased study among preclinical medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:343-55. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse S. Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:42. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Sarabi-Asiabar A, Jafari M, Sadeghifar J, Tofighi S, Zaboli R, Peyman H, et al. The relationship between learning style preferences and gender, educational major and status in first year medical students: a survey study from iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17:e18250. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Dobson JL. A comparison between learning style preferences and sex, status , and course performance. Adv Physiol Educ. 2010;34:197-04. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Nuzhat A, Salem RO, Al Hamdan N, Ashour N. Gender differences in learning styles and academic performance of medical students in Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2013;35:s78-s82. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Akhlaghi N, Mirkazemi H, Jafarzade M, Akhlaghi Nl. Does learning style preferences influence academic performance among dental students in Isfahan, Iran? J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2008;15:8. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. 2006;30:13-6. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Al-Mohrej O, Al-Ayedh N, Masuadi E, Al-Kenani N. Learning methods and strategies of anatomy among medical students in two different institutions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2017;39:S15-S21. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Bitran M, Zúñiga D, Pedrals N, Padilla O, Mena B. Medical students’ change in learning styles during the course of the undergraduate program: from ‘thinking and watching’ to ‘thinking and doing’. Can Med Educ J. 2012;3:e86-e97. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
Grasha T. The naturalistic approach to learning styles. Coll Teach. 1990;38:106-13. [Full Text | DOI]
Roberts M. Producing tomorrow’s doctors, the new challenge for today’s undergraduate medical curriculum. J Vocat Educ Training. 2004;56:46. [Full Text | DOI]
Toquero CM. Emergency Remote Teaching amid COVID-19: The Turning Point. Asian J Distance Educ. 2020;15:185-8. [Full Text]
Knowles M. Self-directed learning: A guide for leaners and teachers. Chicago, IL: Follett Publishing, 1975. [Full Text | DOI]
Knowles M. The adult learner: A neglected species. 3rd ed. Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1984. [Full Text]
Vaughn L, Baker R. Teaching in the medical setting: balancing teaching styles, learning styles and teaching methods. Med Teach. 2001;23:610-12. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]